Business Blogging Articles Blogs

Be careful who you link to

December 14th, 2004

by Dave Cooper

There is an interesting and amusing thread over at SEW. A punter asks, on the surface, an innocent question as to why his mate’s site has dropped out of Google.

A bunch of the regulars offer some suggestions for possible problems, and then on the second page, GoogleGuy appears and really wades in, revealing the site is linking to some very bad evil affiliate spammers.

Interesting that GoogleGuy would take the time to do some research on the site. Interesting that SEW allow such specifics to be discussed. Interesting that a good number of other SEO’s didn’t catch the real problem. And amusing that the punter gets his butt kicked from very high up in such a public manner. At least he had the good grace to admit he’s been a bad boy.

The lesson here people, is to be careful who you link to and who they link to in turn. Reciprocal linking is bad, you don’t know who else they have requested a link from. And do you have the time and skills to research those link properly. It took GoogleGuy to find the real problem and a bunch of professional SEO’s missed it.

Spread the word: delicious this:Be careful who you link to digg this:Be careful who you link to spurl this:Be careful who you link to furl this:Be careful who you link to reddit this:Be careful who you link to Add to Y!:Be careful who you link to

Google Desktop: Total Search Recall

December 13th, 2004

by Brian Klais

Google Desktop Search gives customers “Total Search Recall” capabilities - altering search engine optimization as we know it

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Google Desktop: Total Search Recall digg this:Google Desktop: Total Search Recall spurl this:Google Desktop: Total Search Recall furl this:Google Desktop: Total Search Recall reddit this:Google Desktop: Total Search Recall Add to Y!:Google Desktop: Total Search Recall

Information As Power

December 10th, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in Web ReDesign 2.0: Workflow That Works

Most companies don’t even realize their competitors are “eating their lunch” online - ranking higher in the search engines, getting more traffic, converting more visitors into buyers and enjoying better returns on their website investment. They simply don’t know how well their website is performing. And they are missing out on valuable e-business opportunities.

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Information As Power digg this:Information As Power spurl this:Information As Power furl this:Information As Power reddit this:Information As Power Add to Y!:Information As Power

RSS is the ultimate opt-in

December 1st, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

If you haven’t heard about RSS yet, you need to check it out! RSS (Really Simple Syndication) is a standard designed for syndicating headlines and other web content to other websites. It has evolved into a popular means for individuals to keep up with the latest articles and musings across favorite websites — using RSS newsreader software (which is starting to get built into web browsers and email clients). RSS is widely used in blogs (including this one — just check the RSS link on the bottom right column) and on news sites such as the BBC and CNN.

RSS, in my opinion, has the power to turn email marketing on its head. RSS represents a separate web-delivered channel that, quite unlike email, is impossible to spam. If the subscriber doesn’t add your RSS feed to his or her newsreader software or web-based news aggregator (like My Yahoo!), then you can’t break through to him or her. What a brilliant idea! I think it’s inevitable that most newsletters and promotional content will eventually be delivered through RSS feeds rather than to our email in-boxes. The overload of spam is driving many consumers to RSS as a secure and unspamable way of getting news and commentary. And, as David Sklar opines, RSS will hopefully become the standard for companies to actually conduct real business with their customers. David is spot-on when he calls RSS the “ultimate opt-in.”

Spread the word: delicious this:RSS is the ultimate opt-in digg this:RSS is the ultimate opt-in spurl this:RSS is the ultimate opt-in furl this:RSS is the ultimate opt-in reddit this:RSS is the ultimate opt-in Add to Y!:RSS is the ultimate opt-in

Watch Your Language!

November 1st, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in Catalog Age

When it comes to breaking through to your customers’ email inbox, it’s getting to be less about what you say and more about how you say it. The spam net that i.merchants must circumvent is getting ever more sophisticated and, dare we say, overzealous. In fact, recent surveys indicate that more than one-third of permission emails that consumers want to receive from trusted sources are being blocked by email filters and corporate firewalls.

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Watch Your Language! digg this:Watch Your Language! spurl this:Watch Your Language! furl this:Watch Your Language! reddit this:Watch Your Language! Add to Y!:Watch Your Language!

Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 2)

October 26th, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in MarketingProfs

Partially indexed, poorly ranked, penalized and possibly banned: such is the unpleasant fate of a Web site that’s not duly optimized for the search engines.

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 2) digg this:Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 2) spurl this:Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 2) furl this:Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 2) reddit this:Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 2) Add to Y!:Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 2)

Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 1)

October 19th, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in MarketingProfs

Many consider search engine optimization (SEO) - the process of enhancing your Web site’s visibility in the search engines through ways other than paid search ads - a sort of black box. But once the essential features of a search-engine-optimal Web site are laid out in a concise list, SEO is not nearly as mystifying.

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 1) digg this:Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 1) spurl this:Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 1) furl this:Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 1) reddit this:Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 1) Add to Y!:Best and Worst Practices in Search Engine Marketing (Part 1)

On the Right Page for Web Indexing

October 1st, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in Catalog Age

Google and Yahoo! have become much more aggressive in their crawling behavior, going deeper into dynamic, database-driven websites than ever before. A closer look, however, reveals that some bad news is mixed in with the good…

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:On the Right Page for Web Indexing digg this:On the Right Page for Web Indexing spurl this:On the Right Page for Web Indexing furl this:On the Right Page for Web Indexing reddit this:On the Right Page for Web Indexing Add to Y!:On the Right Page for Web Indexing

Unlocking Google’s Hidden Potential as a Research Tool (Part 5 of 5)

August 31st, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in MarketingProfs

Seek and ye shall find. But not always.

According to an IDC (International Data Corporation) report from last year, knowledge workers spend 15-30% of their day searching for information. What’s worse, more than half of their online searches fail.

That doesn’t bode well for us, does it? Hopefully, this series has gone a long way to help you make the invisibly rich Internet more visible. We close this series by tapping into the wisdom and experience of two renowned Google experts—Nancy Blachman and Tara Calishain—who share some of their favorite tips, tools, insights, and search strategies for researching with Google.

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Unlocking Google's Hidden Potential as a Research Tool (Part 5 of 5) digg this:Unlocking Google's Hidden Potential as a Research Tool (Part 5 of 5) spurl this:Unlocking Google's Hidden Potential as a Research Tool (Part 5 of 5) furl this:Unlocking Google's Hidden Potential as a Research Tool (Part 5 of 5) reddit this:Unlocking Google's Hidden Potential as a Research Tool (Part 5 of 5) Add to Y!:Unlocking Google's Hidden Potential as a Research Tool (Part 5 of 5)

Yahoo! & Google’s overlaping results fewer than you’d think

August 29th, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

There’s a brand new meta search engine on the block called Jux2. Its premise is to find the overlap between the top 10 results across two major search engines. So far I’m really impressed with it. It even has a toolbar for Mozilla FireFox.

Jux2 conducted some tests to determine just how much overlap there is in the top search results on Google versus Yahoo! The results of their tests are very interesting. Such as:

  • Analysis of Google and Yahoo! search results on the 500 most popular search terms found that, on average, Google and Yahoo! shared only 3.8 of their top 10 results. Furthermore, 30% of the search terms had 2 or fewer overlapping terms, and only 17% had 6 or more overlapping results among the top 10.
  • The overlapping set of top 10 results between Google and Ask Jeeves was even smaller: 3.4 out of 10. And between Yahoo! and Ask Jeeves, smaller yet: 3.1 out of 10.
  • Analysis of 91 random searches on Google and Yahoo! found that the two engines share only 23% of their top 100 results. Furthermore, only 4.8 of Google’s top 10 results even made Yahoo’s top 100. And only 5.4 of Yahoo’s top 10 made Google’s top 100.

For me, Jux2’s findings were a good reminder that the algorithms of the major search engines are markedly different, more so than one might imagine. So a metasearch engine that compares and contrasts two partially overlapping sets of search results makes a lot of sense. I think I’ll try Jux2 for a while and report back on my experiences.

Spread the word: delicious this:Yahoo! & Google's overlaping results fewer than you'd think digg this:Yahoo! & Google's overlaping results fewer than you'd think spurl this:Yahoo! & Google's overlaping results fewer than you'd think furl this:Yahoo! & Google's overlaping results fewer than you'd think reddit this:Yahoo! & Google's overlaping results fewer than you'd think Add to Y!:Yahoo! & Google's overlaping results fewer than you'd think

Pages (38): « First ... « 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 » ... Last »


Related tags

and/or

Newsletter

Web marketing virtuoso Stephan Spencer, shares a wealth of emarketing experience and hard-hitting, practical advice in our monthly newsletter. It's full of valuable insights...You should subscribe.








Latest posts
Latest comments


Contact Us

HEADQUARTERS
2820 Walton Commons West, Suite 123
Madison, WI 53718 USA
Phone: (608) 285-6600
Toll-free: 888 207-1109

REGIONAL OFFICE
36 Anzac Rd., Browns Bay
Auckland, New Zealand
Phone: (+64) 9 476-4601
infodesk@netconcepts.com